Score: 4. It is the nature of space itself that seems to be at the heart of the mysteries in physics and cosmology today. Einstein also told us that space is a something. He showed it could be stretched and warped when he published General Relativity in But over the last one hundred years, the nature of empty space has continued to become more mysterious and confusing. But we still have a lot more to learn! That is the subject of this book. In this work, he takes on a fundamental concept of modern physics: nothing.
The physics of stuff—protons, neutrons, electrons, and even quarks and gluons—is at least somewhat familiar to most of us. But what about the physics of nothing? Isaac Newton thought of empty space as nothingness extended in all directions, a kind of theater in which physics could unfold. Nothing, it turns out, is an awful lot like something, with a structure and properties every bit as complex and mysterious as matter.
In his signature lively prose, Weatherall explores the very nature of empty space—and solidifies his reputation as a science writer to watch. Drawing on Jungian ideas of quest and individual and Queer theory, Marie Herholdt Jorgensen shows how these concepts in the works of winterson are grounded in the prospect of numerous potential realities in which several narrations of the self are made possible.
Winterson disrupts the notion of one objective reality and instead centers on the individual as the narrator of various versions of reality and the self.
The book contains summaries of all of Winterson's novels, making the book accessible for readers previously unfamiliar with jeanette winterson. The theatre narrows life down. It narrows it down in many ways. It is always hard for anyone to have one single aim in life—in the theatre, however, the goal is clear.
From the first rehearsal, the aim is always visible, not too far away, and it involves everyone. Furthermore, in society in general the role of art is nebu- lous.
Most people could live perfectly well without any art at all—and even if they regretted its absence it would not hamper their functioning in any way. But in the theatre there is no such separation: at every instant the practical question is an artistic one: the most incoherent, uncouth player is as much involved in matters of pitch and pace, intonation and rhythm, position, distance, colour and shape as the most sophisticated.
In rehearsal, the height of the chair, the texture of the costume, the brightness of the light, the quality of emotion, matter all the time: the aesthetics are practical. One would be wrong to say that this is because the theatre is an art.
The stage is a reflection of life, but this life cannot be re-lived for a moment without a working system based on observing certain values and making value-judgements.
He begins to speak, and as he does so the hearts of the audience wrench. I will be discussing all that I have learnt about the different form of theatre he discusses. He tries to categories theatre into four different types of theatre. The first category I shall be discussing is The Deadly Theatre. Peter Brook. Not, however, unique: the metaphor of search and movement presides over the recent collection of occasional writings by , Brook , published as The Shifting Point: Forty Years of Theatrical Exploration, — London , The lectures explore the nature and purpose of the theatre, examine aspects of contemporary theatre production and philosophy that 1.
0コメント